University Times

Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro

Cal State LA community debates over the limits of free speech and the place in public universities for divisive political dialogue

Back to Article
Back to Article

Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro

Hannah Jacobsen

Hang on for a minute...we're trying to find some more stories you might like.

Email This Story

On Jan. 21st, Cal State LA’s Young Americans for Freedom (YAF) chapter published a post on their Facebook page announcing that Ben Shapiro, a conservative speaker and the editor-in-chief of The Daily Wire, would arrive on campus on Feb. 25th to speak at the group’s event ‘When Diversity Becomes a Problem’ in the University-Student Union Theatre. Since its announcement, intense social media debate has cropped up between members of both Cal State LA and outside affiliations.

‘When Diversity Becomes a Problem’ is one of the many stops in Shapiro’s national college tour for YAF. It claims to be a “nationwide tour invading campus ‘safe spaces’,” according to The Daily Wire.

This tour follows Shapiro’s highly controversial appearances at the University of Missouri and Otay Ranch High School, the latter resulted in an administrator of Otay Ranch High School actually stopping the event mid-speech “because he (Shapiro) informed the students that Americans who were permanently poor had made poor decisions rather than suffered victimization by the American system,” according to The Daily Wire. The belief among some members of Cal State LA is that this campus is one of many being targeted for its strong diversity values.  

“This is part of a wide campaign around the country by right wing reactionary groups that are targeting diverse campuses such as ours,” said Dr. Robert Weide, a sociology professor at Cal State LA. “Our campus is largely people of color, we serve marginalized communities across South L.A., East L.A., and San Gabriel, and we won the fight last year over having an ethnic studies course as a graduation requirement, a fight which some are still angry about.”

This anger between two very different attitudes is quickly pointed out by the YAF page, which states that “based on Shapiro’s record of igniting the fury of leftist activists at every school he visits, it is fair to expect that this lecture tour will include a variety of explosive confrontations with campus liberals.”

Concern over the context of this event—which speaks out against trigger warnings, microaggressions, Black Lives Matter, safe spaces, and #concernedstudents1950 among other topics—has indeed led to intense discussion among Facebook users on the event’s page, drawing commenters from across the United States. A Facebook opposition page titled “POWER TO THE PEOPLE! Anti-racist Counter Demonstration” has even been set up to oppose YAF’s event and the funding for it, which was partly provided by Associated Students, Inc. (ASI).

The counter-event page’s host, Jose Trinidad Castañeda III, voiced his concerns over the deeper meaning of such an event occurring at Cal State LA.

“The points YAF are trying to get at go deeper than the Facebook comments section. They use certain arguments to make the case that the Left is attacking freedom of speech and intellectual inquiry,” Castañeda wrote. “They’ve latched onto this idea that we are all victims, and we have created a culture of victimhood. This situation is symbolic and representative of political tensions igniting across the U.S.”

Multiple Facebook users, both Cal State LA students and faculty, have lent support to this view, saying that Shapiro’s viewpoint makes light of the hardship faced by People of Color (POC) and that it threatens the safety of Cal State LA’s extremely diverse campus community.  

“Cal State LA is one of the most diverse campuses in this country,” Cal State LA student Jaime Guzmán wrote. “It is considered a Hispanic-serving institution and this event is being held? Let’s not forget that this campus is on the outskirts of East Los Angeles, quite literally between East L.A. and El Sereno, both communities known for the Chicano Civil Rights Movement!”

YAF has responded to this with articles against “CSULA leftists”—stating that protestors are “spoiled children” trying to destroy free speech—and against Dr. Weide. Multiple ultraconservative news sources have banded together to accuse Dr. Weide of threatening students through the Facebook event page.

This occurred after a Facebook supporter of the event, who was not a student, posted the profile picture of a Cal State LA student and attempted to intimidate and mock them. Dr. Weide responded with the intention of defending this student against the Facebook users who were not actually members of the Cal State LA community.  

A band of conservative newspapers—including Shapiro’s The Daily Wire, Ethics Alarms, and The Blaze—soon published articles accusing the professor of physically threatening Cal State LA students, a gross misconception which has resulted in phoned in and emailed death threats from some of the same people who’ve lashed out at the events protesters on the Facebook page. A crime report on these threats has been filed with the campus police.

A man named Doyle Simons, who wrote “a bit of advice, watch your back from now on, emailed one such threat to Dr. Weide, “You never know when someone is gonna take that shot. It may be a bar or parking lot or even between classes! Oh what great fun. I’m white and looking forward to seeing you.”

Mark Kahanding, finance major at Cal State LA and the chair of Cal State LA’s YAF chapter, also responded to make the argument that this event was not inherently racist.

“You do realize an Asian made this event right?,” Kadanding asked Facebook protesters. “There are only 6 members. Only one of my members is white. Another is Asian and the other four are Hispanic. None of us give a c**p [sic] because conservatism binds us together, unlike you liberals who separate by race.”

Kahanding stated that this event should not be silenced because a college’s job is to learn about and debate opposing viewpoints. Cal State LA student Dylan Gunartne agreed with this view.

“As a student here at Cal State LA, I believe that we shouldn’t be silencing Shapiro’s viewpoint,” Gunartne said. “We should be encouraging other students to engage in this discussion—a discussion that has become a hot button issue in campuses across the country. If we can’t do that here in college, what’s the point of higher learning?”

Many students and faculty, however, have announced that this event is not so much an open debate as an attack.

“If someone wants to discuss politics, that’s great, but this is an attack on our campus,” Dr. Weide said. “There are conservative faculty here, including my colleague Dr. Bradley Campbell who even wrote about microaggression, but he was having a dialogue, not launching an attack against our community. This is much different.”

Cal State LA’s student government within ASI appears to have followed through with supporting this event, at least financially. The ASI finance committee approved YAF for a maximum of $560 and, after meeting to review a possible violation of policy in its funding at a finance committee meeting last Friday, they have finalized their decision to fund this event.

“As far as ASI is concerned, this club provided all the needed documentation outlined in our policies and the event is registered. ASI had already approved funding to the event on January 15th with the total amount of $560,” Antonio Canzona, the ASI Vice President for Finance and Chair of the Finance Committee wrote.

As the nation faces the same essential in controversial speakers such as Donald Trump, the core of the debate has descended to the college community: how far do the rights of free speech extend? Can colleges block or defund the political beliefs of their students or should they allow political speech, even if it preaches disregard for whole groups of people? The weeks leading up to the event will set the precedent for what can be said and who has the right to be heard.


Print Friendly, PDF & Email

11 Responses to “Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro”

  1. Captain Canada Eh on February 2nd, 2016 5:49 pm

    “conservatism binds us together, unlike you liberals who separate by race.”

    As a former Liberal this is exactly why I left that damn party, they have to label everything and everyone.

  2. Anthony on February 2nd, 2016 7:10 pm

    The professor did threaten students and the simple fact the CSULA is okay with professors acting so unprofessional is sad. Way to spin the story in a negative aspect for YAF.

  3. Cash on February 3rd, 2016 9:12 pm

    Shouldn’t students and faculty that disagree with Ben’s opinions want Ben to lecture?

    If you believe that your viewpoint is correct, then you must believe that the facts will stand with you, in open discussion/dialog.

    Why would anyone want to silence those who disagree with their views?

  4. Angelica on February 3rd, 2016 10:14 pm

    I am looking forward to his visit 🙂

  5. Dylan on February 5th, 2016 3:59 pm

    Instead of trying to get Ben banned, and in effect banning speech, engage him in a debate.

  6. Cash on February 5th, 2016 5:32 pm

    This should be the ultimate goal for both sides, to engage in honest debate.

    Any dirty tricks (trying to silence debate, using slurs, ect) by either side needs to be called out fully by their fellow peers and needs to be frowned upon and attacked by all.

    In this case, liberals should condemn the actions of the CSULB students and staff in their attempt to silence Ben and his opposing views.

  7. Bradley Campbell on February 19th, 2016 4:34 pm

    From the article: “’If someone wants to discuss politics, that’s great, but this is an attack on our campus,’ Dr. Weide said. ‘There are conservative faculty here, including my colleague Dr. Bradley Campbell who even wrote about microaggression….’”

    I have no comment on the larger controversy, but Professor Weide has no basis for the political label he attaches to me. The journal article he refers to, “Microaggression and Moral Cultures,” which I co-authored with Jason Manning of West Virginia University, is a theoretical analysis of microaggression complaints and related phenomena. It does not offer a judgment of anything; nor do any of my other journal articles or my book. I have, however, in a few other public forums, expressed some of my moral views about these subjects, noting how I see my views as rooted in my larger support for charity, academic freedom, free speech, and non-violence. My wish is of course that Weide and others would embrace these values, if they do not already, but I do not see these values as conservative or liberal – or especially political at all.

  8. Joe Damron on February 23rd, 2016 4:58 pm

    So called “liberals” ironically cannot comprehend the consequences of banning speech they disagree with. Hannah’s irrational defense for censoring mainstream conservative speakers by maligning them as “controversial” shows volumes of progressive students also lack the requisite cognative ability to understand that they are closeminded.

    What can be done to educate the willfully brain dead, who COWER from ideas that counter their racial-Marxist indoctrination training?

  9. Joe on February 24th, 2016 4:33 am

    Ben’s message is one of freedom- and it’s exactly what minority students at CSULA need to hear. They have been held down by the race-obsessed, class obsessed, identity obsessed, tribal racist throwbacks of the American Left. People of color, reclaim your humanity and listen to what Ben Shapiro has to say. His only agenda is truth, and I for one would much rather serve truth than wait for the scraps that fall from the table of the Leftist Aristocracy.

  10. Kelly Madison on February 26th, 2016 1:54 pm

    I believe in free speech and dialogue. But he came to campus to start a fight not a dialogue– that was evident in the purposely inflammatory nature of the flyers and topic for the event, the busing in of outsiders who reportedly initiated the physical violence that occurred, and his speech full of his usual labeling of people as children, evil, fascist, etc. — everything worked out perfectly according to his/YAF’s plan. The study of white supremacy, classism, heterosexism, etc. is what allows people to reclaim our common humanity. The black live matter movement is about claiming and insisting on having our humanity recognized. Pretending that white racist, patriarchal, and classist policies and practices have not/don’t exist, don’t have a clear factual history and impact, and haven’t restricted the “freedom” of the majority of people in this country throughout our history and right up to this day, is by definition ignore-ant, anti-intellectual, selfish, and a betrayal of the most important principles and values that this country, at its best, stands for. It is too late in the game to ignore what ought to be self-evident: That all [human beings] are created equal, and are endowed by their creator with certain unalienable rights. Freedom of speech doesn’t mean you get to declare whole groups of human beings inferior, support policies, practices and ideas that subjugate them, and not be met with protest. Free speech is a two way street. Mr. Shapiro manipulated the situation so that he got to freely spew his hateful and degrading speech with those who oppose his views in our campus community literally locked out of the discussion. Then has the nerve, while decrying a supposed leftist predilection for victimhood, to declare himself the victim of the events and antagonisms he purposely orchestrated. He should come back for the proposed dialogue on “diversity” if he becomes capable in actually engaging in a respectful, mutually illuminating dialogue worthy of a University.

  11. Forsberg on March 18th, 2016 4:33 am

    Congratulations Kelly, you managed to include every BS social justice term you could muster. I know you did it to sound deep or educated, but you come off as neither. The fact that you would require such meaningless terms proves it.

    Also, Freedom of speech does include those things. Even though he didnt refer to anyone as being inferior. See, you had to lie to make it as there is a wrong. He also didnt need to set up the situation. Everyone knows how children on college campuses react to the littlest thing. He wasnt the one who threatened people. He wasnt the one who blocked the doors or pulled the fire alarm. No manipulation needed. But once again, you are caught lying.

    I also like how you said “white racists”, because you wanted to excuse racists of all other races. Weird how that works, isnt it?

If you want a picture to show with your comment, go get a gravatar.

Navigate Left
  • Campus News

    Measles Exposure Leaves Hundreds Quarantined

  • Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro


    Letter From the Editor

  • Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro


    Letter From the Editor

  • Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro


    Letter From the Editor

  • Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro


    Editor-in-Chief Addresses

  • Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro


    Hi Golden Eagles!

  • Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro


    Letter From The Editor

  • Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro


    Grab ‘em by the Presidency: The Female 2020 Democratic Presidential Candidates

  • Conservative group under fire for upcoming controversial speaker Ben Shapiro


    Letter From The Editor

  • Campus News

    Settlement Reached between University and Former Athletic Administrator

Navigate Right
The student news site of California State University - Los Angeles